🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Authority Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A New Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not really creating the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing too much that system. Bring in the process guy and then bin them for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.